This website uses cookies.
Office of the Election Supervisor for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

OFFICE OF THE ELECTION SUPERVISOR

for the

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS

IN RE: G.T. Davis,                                     )           Protest Decision 2011 ESD 253

                                                                        )           Issued: May 12, 2011

             Protestor.                                           )           OES Case Nos. P-229-031611-GP                

____________________________________)

            G.T. Davis, member of Local Union 455, filed a pre-election protest pursuant to Article XIII, Section 2 of the Rules for the 2010-2011 IBT International Union Delegate and Officer Election (“Rules”).  The protest alleged that Hoffa-Vairma campaign literature was posted on union bulletin boards at a worksite of United Airlines, an employer of members of Local Union 455.

 

            Election Supervisor representative Bruce Boyens investigated this protest.

Findings of Fact

            Local Union 455 is entitled to fourteen delegates and five alternate delegates to the IBT convention.   At its nominations meeting held January 4, 2011, one full slate of candidates for delegate and alternate delegate was nominated.  As the candidates were unopposed, they were deemed elected to represent the local union at the convention.  Steve Vairma, principal officer of Local 455, also is a candidate for International office on the Hoffa-Hall 2011 slate and is actively campaigning and raising funds under the name of Hoffa-Vairma.

            Protestor Davis is a rank-and-file member of Local Union 455 employed by United Airlines at the Denver International Airport (DIA).  Davis is not a steward or business agent, and was not nominated to run as a candidate in the union’s delegate election.  Davis told our investigator that he observed a campaign flyer posted on a Local Union 455 official bulletin board at his worksite.  According to Davis, the board is used exclusively for posting of official union notices.  Davis stated that he removed the campaign flyer, believing it was posted there impermissibly.  He stated he was concerned that more flyers were posted on bulletin boards at other worksites under the jurisdiction of Local Union 455.  He told our investigator he did not know who posted the flyer at DIA and had no evidence that similar flyers were posted elsewhere at the facility or at other Local Union 455 worksites.

            When it received the protest acknowledgement, the Hoffa-Vairma campaign, through its attorney, contacted our investigator and acknowledged that the posting on the Local Union 455 bulletin board had violated the Rules.  Counsel claimed the posting had been made by a shop steward and was not authorized by the campaign.  The campaign stated that Vairma, a first-time candidate for International office, had met with all of Local Union 455’s business agents and instructed them of the Rules’ prohibition on using union assets to campaign.  When interviewed, Vairma confirmed that he met with the business agents and discussed with them the proper use of bulletin boards.  He stated that he instructed the business agents to disseminate the message to shop stewards in their respective work locations.

            Vairma’s comments were supported by John Mennly, the business agent assigned to DIA.  Mennly stated that he passed on Vairma’s admonitions about proper campaigning to stewards assigned to the airport.  One steward, Scott Brown, misunderstood the guidance and posted campaign literature on the union bulletin board at his employer, United Airlines.  Brown admitted that Mennly had provided instructions on the Rules but stated that he had misunderstood the instructions.

            Our investigator contacted members employed at other worksites under the local union’s jurisdiction and found no other instance in which a campaign flyer was posted on a union bulletin board.  

           

Analysis

            The Rules prohibit the use of union personnel, funds or equipment to assist in campaigning unless all candidates have equal access to the resource and the union is paid fair market value for use of the resource.  Article VII, Sections 12 (c). 

            Regarding worksite bulletin boards, Article VII, Section 12 (d), states:  “No restrictions shall be placed upon candidates’ or members’ preexisting rights to use employer or Union bulletin boards for campaign publicity.  Similarly, no restrictions shall be placed upon candidates’ or members’ preexisting rights to solicit support, distribute leaflets or literature, conduct campaign rallies, hold fund-raising events or engage in similar activities on employer or Union premises. Such facilities and opportunities shall be made available to all candidates and members on a non-discriminatory basis.”

            Counsel for the Hoffa-Vairma campaign and candidate Vairma both conceded that the posting of the campaign flyer on the union bulletin board at DIA violated the Rules.  All parties to the protest agreed that the bulletin board is glass-enclosed and is customarily locked,[1] limiting access to Local Union 455 representatives.  The bulletin board, under the sole control of the union, was a union facility used for official notices.  As such, there was no pre-existing right to post campaign or general purpose notices there and the bulletin board could not permissibly be used for campaigning.  Nor should Brown have posted the campaign literature while acting in his official capacity as a steward. 

Because no delegate election was ongoing in the local, this brief, improper posting of the campaign literature is far removed from any effect on the possible balloting in the International Officer election in October 2011.  We also recognize that Vairma had instructed business agents on the prohibition against using union resources to campaign.  Davis’s removal of the improper posting was an allowable remedial action.[2]  On these facts, we deem this protest RESOLVED.  Nevertheless, we remind Vairma to continue to educate local union officers, business agents and stewards on the requirements of the Rules, and to have effective follow-up to insure that union bulletin boards or other resources are not used to campaign.

            Any interested party not satisfied with this determination may request a hearing before the Election Appeals Master within two (2) working days of receipt of this decision.  The parties are reminded that, absent extraordinary circumstances, no party may rely upon evidence that was not presented to the Office of the Election Supervisor in any such appeal.  Requests for a hearing shall be made in writing, shall specify the basis for the appeal, and shall be served upon:

Kenneth Conboy

Election Appeals Master

Latham & Watkins

885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000

New York, NY  10022

Fax: (212) 751-4864

Copies of the request for hearing must be served upon the parties, as well as upon the Election Supervisor for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 421 L, Washington, D.C.  20006, all within the time prescribed above.  A copy of the protest must accompany the request for hearing. 




[1] In this instance, however, while the lock was in place, it was not secured.

[2] It is a violation of Article VII, Section 12(a) to remove campaign literature that is properly posted under the Rules.  Here, however, the protestor removed an improperly posted campaign flyer.

 

                                                                        Richard W. Mark

                                                                        Election Supervisor

cc:        Kenneth Conboy

            2011 ESD 253

DISTRIBUTION LIST (BY EMAIL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED):

Bradley T. Raymond, General Counsel

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

25 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

braymond@teamster.org

David J. Hoffa

Hoffa Hall 2011

1100 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Ste. 730

Washington, D.C. 20036

hoffadav@hotmail.com

Ken Paff

Teamsters for a Democratic Union

P.O. Box10128

Detroit, MI 48210-0128

ken@tdu.org

Barbara Harvey

1394 E. Jefferson Avenue

Detroit, MI 48207

blmharvey@sbcglobal.net

Fred Gegare

P.O. Box 9663

Green Bay, WI 54308-9663

kirchmanb@yahoo.com

Scott D. Soldon

3541 N. Summit Avenue

Shorewood, WI 53211

scottsoldon@gmail.com

Fred Zuckerman

3813 Taylor Blvd.

Louisville, KY 40215

fredzuckerman@aol.com

Robert M. Colone, Esq.

P.O. Box272

Sellersburg, IN 47172-0272

rmcolone@hotmail.com

Carl Biers

Box 424, 315 Flatbush Avenue

Brooklyn, NY 11217

info@SandyPope2011.org

Julian Gonzalez

Lewis, Clifton & Nikolaidis, P.C.

350 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1800

New York, NY 10001-5013

jgonzalez@lcnlaw.com


G.T. Davis

gtd53@comcast.net

Steven P. Vairma, Secretary-Treasurer

Teamsters Local Union 455

10 Lakeside Lane, #3A

Denver, CO 80212

mbelo@bw-legal.com

Bruce Boyens

1326 S. Elizabeth St.

Denver, CO 80210

boyensb@aol.com

Mary Ann Campbell

13859 State Road E.

DeSoto, MO  63020

scdennis@aol.com

Maria Ho

Office of the Election Supervisor

1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 421 L

Washington, D.C. 20006

mho@ibtvote.org

Kathryn Naylor

Office of the Election Supervisor

1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 421 L

Washington, D.C. 20006

knaylor@ibtvote.org

Jeffrey Ellison

214 S. Main Street, Ste. 210

Ann Arbor, MI 48104

EllisonEsq@aol.com