This website uses cookies.
Office of the Election Supervisor for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

              January 3, 1996

 

 

VIA UPS OVERNIGHT

 

 


Bob Blanchet

January 3, 1996

Page 1

 

 

Bob Blanchet

3853 Dryden Road

Fremont, CA 94555

 

William Boe

Director of Labor Relations

Airborne Express

3101 Western Ave.

Seattle, WA 98104


Airborne Express

605 Vista Way

Malpitas, CA 95035

 

Paul Alan Levy

Public Citizen Litigation

1600 20th St., N.W.

Washington, D.C.  XXX-XX-XXXX


Bob Blanchet

January 3, 1996

Page 1

 

 

 

Re: Election Office Case No. P-228-LU287-CSF

 

 

Gentlepersons:

 

Bob Blanchet, a member of Local Union 287, filed this protest pursuant to Article XIV, Section 2(b) of the Rules for the IBT 1995-1996 International Union Delegate and Officer Election (Rules).  The protester alleges that his employer, Airborne Express (Employer) prohibited him from wearing a button supporting the reelection of Ron Carey for general president despite the employers preexisting policy permitting employees to wear buttons concerning union matters.

 

This protest was investigated by Regional Coordinator Matthew D. Ross.  There is no dispute that the Assistant Operations Manager at the Employers Malpetas, California facility advised employees, including the protester, that they could not wear pro-Carey buttons.  The employer had permitted employees to wear campaign buttons in the last election and the employees are permitted to wear small union buttons and a shop steward pin.  After the


Bob Blanchet

January 3, 1996

Page 1

 

 

announcement, the protester continued to wear a two inch Ron Carey State button without incident.

 

The Rules at Article VIII, Section 11(a) and (b) provide that all union members have the right to participate in campaign activities, including the right “to openly support or oppose any candidate [and] to aid or campaign for any candidate.”  While members do not have a right to campaign on work time, whether paid by the union or another employer, campaigning incidental to work (or on paid lunch hours or breaks, or similar paid time off) or union business does not violate the Rules.

 

The Rules at Article VIII, Section 11(d) also provide that “no restrictions shall be placed upon candidates’ or members’ preexisting rights to solicit support, distribute leaflets or literature, conduct campaign rallies, hold fundraising events or engage in similar activities on employer or Union premises.”  Among the rights so protected by the Rules is the right of IBT members to wear campaign emblems on buttons, T-shirts or hats while working. See Republic Aviation Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 324 U.S. 793 (1945); Malta Constr. Co., 276 N.L.R.B. 1494 (1985), enforced, 806 F. 2d 1009 (11th Cir. 1986).

 

However, a member’s right to wear campaign emblems, including buttons, while on work time may be circumscribed by the member’s employer or the public at large.  The employer may prevent the wearing of campaign emblems where the prohibition is necessary to maintain production and discipline, safety, or to prevent alienation of customers.

 

Following communications between the Election Officer and representatives of Airborne Express, the employer agreed to permit employees to wear buttons pertaining to delegate and International officer elections as long as the button is no larger than two inches in diameter. The protester has worn his Carey campaign button without incident.

 

Under these circumstances, the Election Officer concludes that further processing of this protest is unwarranted.  The protesters complaint therein was adequately remedied by the employer.

 

Based upon the foregoing, the protest is RESOLVED,

 

Any interested party not satisfied with this determination may request a hearing before the Election Appeals Master within one day of receipt of this letter.  The parties are reminded that, absent extraordinary circumstances, no party may rely upon evidence that was not presented to the Office of the Election Officer in any such appeal.  Requests for a hearing shall be made in writing and shall be served on:

 


Bob Blanchet

January 3, 1996

Page 1

 

 

Kenneth Conboy, Esq.

Latham & Watkins

885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000

New York, NY 10022

Fax (212) 751-4864

 

Copies of the request for hearing must be served on the parties listed above as well as upon the Election Officer, 400 North Capitol Street, Suite 855, Washington, D.C. 20001, Facsimile (202) 624-3525.  A copy of the protest must accompany the request for a hearing.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Barbara Zack Quindel

Election Officer

 

 

 

cc:              Kenneth Conboy, Election Appeals Master

Matthew D. Ross, Regional Coordinator